The Supreme Court decision released this afternoon is interesting. The majority decision raises a number of legal issues.

There is no order saying that the MPs must be allowed in Parliament or order directing that Parliament recognise the said MPs ...

In addition, each affected party is to receive an opportunity for a personal hearing with the designated authority before any ...

The Supreme Court will soon decide whether obtaining a preliminary injunction is sufficient to qualify as a “prevailing party” in order to ...

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Meta must face trial in an antitrust case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ...

It termed the practice "unconstitutional, arbitrary, high-handed and violative of the rule of law, and abuse of power by the ...

The doctrine of God’s wise and sovereign governance doesn’t make history easy to interpret. It makes living through it ...

State lawmakers are again considering a bill to make sure tenants pay their overdue water bills, not the landlords.

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall applauds a court order dismissing the Biden-Harris Administration's "parole in place" ...

Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall applauds a court order dismissing the Biden-Harris Administration’s “parole in place” (PIP) rule that would allow millions of illegal immigrants to circumvent t ...

Even the best written of the hundreds of statutes governing judicial review of agency regulations include ambiguities.

Texas AG Paxton secures a court judgment permanently blocking the Biden administration's "parole in place" immigration policy ...